gm jack
Smash Lord
Well, Marth's D-tilt is a pretty good gimping tool, so their roles are different.D-Tilt
/10char
Now, Roy has one move which is a bit better than Marth's counterpart. What else?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Well, Marth's D-tilt is a pretty good gimping tool, so their roles are different.D-Tilt
/10char
If you are really expecting to hit with a fully charged neutral B, you must be playing people who are in a coma. Shield breaker is more useful on the fact it can do serious damage to shields and also edge guard in exactly the same way. And when tippered and charged, it has massive knockback as well.Roy's B move is better then marths, it is instant ko, and a good edge guarding tool
Roy's up A is good, it can spike(if hit sweet spot) and sends them up in the air for good comboning, marths cant?
Roys run is better than marths becuaes he crouches down more and can doge projectles better.
More?
Umm ok then, thats a lot to take in.To the OP:
Please don't make threads about how you're so indecisive about playing <top tier> because you find <low tier/bottom tier> is cool despite how much they suck and then make stupid, ludicrous, unrealistic arguments about how <low tier/bottom tier> can secretly succeed and surpass pre-existing boundaries.
Doing so basically shows that you clearly want to play <low tier/bottom tier> and are going to play them no matter what practical benefits come from playing <top tier>, and that opinions will be ignored if they support <top tier>, which counters the idea of asking for outside input.
If you've already made up your mind, good for you. Don't ask us to try and change it if you're not going to anyway.
If you want to know how they would compare in terms of success power, maybe you should look at the tier list and read some of the posts in the topic. If you did, you'd probably realize the better character might be the one that is often argued to be the best character in singles and that's roughly 19 spots above the other character and several tiers apart. Roy is argued by many to be bottom tier. They could literally be at opposite ends of the tier list. Given that nobody below the high end of mid tier does anything in the tournament scene in this day and age, I think it's safe to say that arguably bottom tier characters have no place in the winner's circle.Umm ok then, thats a lot to take in.
Well this was about how they would compair. I really dont care about tiers. Its just my opinon.
But I started this becuase i wanted to see what would be better as a main, since i smash so much.
I plan to main both of them, I just wanted to see how people would apply them to situational aspects in fights.
Not start a flame war about top tier is better then lower tier.