Mm, yes, Brawl has everything Smash-64 has and more techniques and tactics (still the love the game the same as Brawl <3).
"Even sm4sh has a bunch of that brawl didn't right? I thought that's why it was received so much better"
This is where I get annoyed by false accusations, first off, Smash-4 isn't no where near technicality tactics and overall more options wise. Smash-4 been getting "patched" which is simply the term "nerf" (downgraded).
However what Smash-4 has that Brawl doesn't have is oh sweet "balance" yet that's bull but many want to believe it when in reality, Sheik and the other S Tier characters keep winning tournaments and the other characters don't (just like Brawl nothing more nothing less).
Smash-4 is seen more valuable, because the game is "balanced" and Brawl isn't which is true.
The game is so simple even a baby could play the game, no techniques to worry about (even more simple and difficulty to actually experiment to improve your character really). Lastly, Smash-4 is seen more "faster" and without the use of tripping (which is the only problem, yet many like to take advantage and add extra bull twist rumors that are 100% false). MK is debatable since MetaKnight hasn't won consistently like he always has (because we Brawl players are figuring him out day by day).
Fighting games are always unbalanced no matter what patch bull anyone can think of to "improve". Smash is actually a party fighting game but still displays "fighting" so the game shouldn't be an exception and wasn't until Smash-4 came in.
Play the game okay (Smash-4) but don't throw false accusations like they have been feeding you. I've been here since 2006 but made an account in 2011 I know what I'm ranting about. I don't "sugarcoat" lies, I write or say the truth on both games without false bs.
I have played Smash-4 btw (first week when the game came out). Then after another week of consistently playing the game, I came to the final decision and that's Smash-4 has nothing worth wild to offer and I was right. It's a over "hyped" that is seen bigger but in reality it isn't. Thanks.