Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
should had been in since Brawl or at least Sm4sh IMO since he's an iconic Nintendo villain alongside andthat deserves as much recognition.
are obvious. or sooner. Pacman in particular might be the one video game character in existence even more well-known than Mario.
Had King K. Rool of been added in Brawl. He may had never endured that decade long absence.
Should have gotten in Melee Should have gotten in Melee (was planned, but didn't due to time constraints) Should have gotten in Melee Should have gotten in Melee (again, was planned but didn't due to time constraints) Should have gotten in Melee Should have gotten in Brawl Should have gotten in Brawl Should have gotten in Brawl Should have gotten in Brawl
IIRC that was 64 actually. Why he wasn't put into Melee nor was considered I don't know why...
was actually supposed to be in Melee and replace , but time constraints and an uncertainty that Mother 3 would even been made, got in Melee, and not adding , as you can tell, this makes me kinda sad. King Dedede was planned for both 64 and Melee as well as Pit.
Had Lucas gotten in Melee, it would have been the Earthbound 64 version of the character. That didn't happen because of the N64 version of Mother 3 getting cancelled.
Odd I never found any info on him being planned or considered for Melee but I suppose that could had been the case since he was planned for 64.
He didn't make it in due to time constraints which, I already said. That's why we have six clones in Melee as well as Ganondorf forever being Falcondorf.
,,,,, and were all suppose to be in Melee. I have a feeling was going to be in Melee as well because of him not having a trophy in that game, but K. Rool and Dixie did. This was around the time Microsoft went to buy Rare which, is probably the reason why Diddy didn't make it in Melee because Rare still owned the rights to him at the time before the buyout.
As far as I'm concerned,Title says it. Discuss what characters already in the game that should had been in earlier? For me I feel
all should have been in as early as Melee, should have made it in by Smash 4 and no later.I agree with Melee being to early for K. Rool, with how many all stars that needed to get in before him. But he definitely should have gotten in as early as Brawl.As far as I'm concerned,
(64) (64) (64/Melee) (Melee) (Brawl) (Brawl) (Brawl) (Brawl) (Maybe 4 DLC)
It's interesting to think. What would Dunk Hunt's moveset be like if they were in Smash 64? It definitely would be simpler.
Should have been in Smash 64 instead of Puff (and for that matter) should have been in melee Should have been in Melee....? Should have been in the Smash 4 base roster by I understand the time constraints Should have been in Melee Should have been in brawl Should have been in the Smash 4 base game instead of Lucina Should have been Smash 4 DLC instead of Bayo Should have been Smash 4 DLC instead of Corrin Should have been in Melee
- Should've been in Smash 64- Should've been in Melee- Should've been in Melee- Should've been in Melee (if not, then )- Should've been in Melee- Should've probably been in Brawl (don't care about the character and franchise tho)- Should've been in Brawl- Shouldn't have been cut in Brawl- Should've been in Brawl- Should've literally been in Smash 4- Could've been included in Smash 4, glad they didn't tho- Shouldn't have been cut- Should've been in 4, due to massive fan demandCastlevania isn't a Nintendo series, it's a Konami series. But you're right though, Simon deserved to be in Smash much earlier than Ultimate. I would say he should have been in Brawl instead of Snake because of Castlevania's deep history on the older Nintendo consoles.
or should have been in Melee, then that means that I feel like they should have been in more than . But either way, here it goes. should have been in 64. should have been in Melee.should have been in Brawl.:ultJoker: should have been in the base roster of Smash 4.Not sure if this is an abstract joke post or not but almost none of those characters existed before the Smash game in which they were introduced.Its hard to say because if a character should have been in earlier in Smash, that means that they should have been a higher priority than others. So if I said that
- Super Smash Bros. 64- Super Smash Bros. Melee- Super Smash Bros. Brawl - Super Smash Bros. for 3DS/Wii U (Brawl), (Smash Wii U), (Melee) but I feel adding these characters to these respective games would have been a courageous decision by Sakurai at the time.
Could 64 even support transforming characters?Hard to properly place due to each game's time constraints and etc, but if we just went with each game's roster size and timing:
Then you have a bunch that would make sense:
No; but we're ignoring the game's actual rules and focusing more on when the character could have been ideally added based on their success, popularity, and relevancy.
It was. But did I mess up with somebody?
- Without Smash 64, I don't think he would have been added in Smash. While he might have shown up in Melee, he would have been too old to be recent enough for Brawl onward, but too new to be a retro.-Ultimate was dedicated to fan favorites being added and if Cloud wasn't a veteran, most people would use him as a character that would never appear in Smash.- Dr. Mario wouldn't be a requested character, maybe an alternate skin, but Smash doesn't give characters alternative skins for the most part (exceptions are there. Mostly and the gendered characters)- Why Falco over the other two members of Team Star Fox? Peppy and Slippy feel like they are more important and/or more iconic to the series than Falco. Plus and Krystal would probably be more requested than the three of them.- Ganon would probably be added instead. - Gen 6 would have been passed over with a playable character like Gen 3 and Gen 5. - See Greninja but with replace Pokemon with Fire Emblem and Ike with Greninja, like how Ephraim was skipped over. - Would have been out of the anime at the time. - The Punch Out wii game wouldn't have been 10 years old, and his series would be too relavent to be retro, and too old to be recent.- See Ike. Plus without echoes, I feel like Dark Pit would have decloned and echoes wouldn't have been a concept. - With Ryu in the game, we would have still gotten a Ken echo. Probably not himself, but has a chance to come in Ultimate.- New legendary Pokemon and all. Still likely.-Miis are no longer as important in the Switch as they were in the Wii and Wii U eras. - They would have never added Pichu if he wasn't in Melee.&- Uprising had come and gone, and without Dark Pit, I feel like the echo concept would have been dropped and they would have given Lucina something to different herself from both Marth and Roy.- Transformation characters were impossible in Smash 4.- See Ike.- See Ike. - See Ike.&- Fans would have thought that Megaman was enough probably. - If she wasn't orginally attached to Zelda, she would not have been in later Smash games.- Did anybody think Snake was possible before he was in Brawl? Or 3rd Parties in general? & - People would probably be okay with just the other younger version of Link.- Isabelle would have been added as the only character for the series. She became the face of the franchise. - Did literally anybody ever think she was going to be in? I assume that most people would pick the balance board if they suggested a character from Wii Fit specifically.- Would she have been added if not already a transformation for Samus? Also, Smash 4 didn't have transformations.
And now his character is doomed so as long as there never exists a franchise overhaul.
Or, ya know, Sakurai leaves. I don't want a series overhaul, but if he could be less stubborn and make weird decisions, that'd be nice.
