BluePikmin11
Akko is my dear daughter!
I don't think that's a really fair comparison.
Young Link existed to fill in last-minute clones in Melee.
Young Link existed to fill in last-minute clones in Melee.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
In that case, now that they have all the time in the world to develop DLC characters, and have to convince customers that these DLC characters are worth buying, why would they go with a character previously chosen to be a last-minute addition? Wouldn't it be wiser to use all that time to develop unique characters that many people would love to have in Smash, like Mewtwo?I don't think that's a really fair comparison.
Young Link existed to fill in last-minute clones in Melee.
Exactly. They'd go for characters that people actually want to buy.In that case, now that they have all the time in the world to develop DLC characters, and have to convince customers that these DLC characters are worth buying, why would they go with a character previously chosen to be a last-minute addition? Wouldn't it be wiser to use all that time to develop unique characters that many people would love to have in Smash, like Mewtwo?
Just marketing? That seems like a sort of flimsy excuse, doesn't it? I mean, if pure marketing mattered so much for DLC, why did we get Mewtwo and not something like Sceptile?The easy answer, to market Majora's Mask 3D regardless if they are a clone or not. If they can give him a unique moveset (which has a 50/50 chance of happening IMO) or came in a cut veterans pack, it'll probably sell decently.
...It's outright counterproductive to make DLC that people may not want to buy.We don't know if that will completely be the case for all DLC characters yet.
Because Mewtwo as a characters sells for Smash more than Sceptile would sell in Smash nor would he as a character truly affect someone wanting Omega/Alpha any more than any other Pokemon character.Just marketing? That seems like a sort of flimsy excuse, doesn't it? I mean, if pure marketing mattered so much for DLC, why did we get Mewtwo and not something like Sceptile?
Marketing is a definite possibility, but I think it'd be a combination of both Marketing and Popularity. Mewtwo promotes Pokemon regardless of whether he has an importance in a specific Pokemon game, and he's the #1 most wanted Smash character worldwide.Just marketing? That seems like a sort of flimsy excuse, doesn't it? I mean, if pure marketing mattered so much for DLC, why did we get Mewtwo and not something like Sceptile?
...It's outright counterproductive to make DLC that people may not want to buy.
That's EXACTLY the point. If "just marketing" was an excuse, Sceptile would be the better pick because he's got a bigger role in Omega/Alpha. However, Mewtwo is far more popular. The point is that its not "just" marketing. Popularity also plays a factor here. Just releasing a random character 100% for marketing reasons isn't going to cut it. It has to be someone people actually want. Young Link isn't a character anyone is really clamoring for.Because Mewtwo as a characters sells for Smash more than Sceptile would sell in Smash nor would he as a character truly affect someone wanting Omega/Alpha any more than any other Pokemon character.
If he came in a pack full of new content, then technically he could sell....It's outright counterproductive to make DLC that people may not want to buy.
No. Lincoln is the only one from what I saw.Are all the characters in STEAM are based on real life people?
All except the protagonist, I think.Are all the characters in STEAM are based on real life people?
I honestly expect it to be a flop, and I don't care about the look of it all that much. It doesn't interest me, though it is hilarious seeing Abraham Lincoln, the Cowardly Lion and Tom Sawyer.Tom Sawyer seems pretty great too.
Regardless, I sort of get the feeling we won't see a character from Codename: Steam.
Unless one of the characters becomes Mewtwo-levels of demanded.
But that probably won't happen since Codename: Steam is probably not going to be very successful.
Fix'dSo following the direct, I edited my list a bit
S tier
Mewtwo
A tier
Wolf, Lucas, Snake
B tier
King K Rool, Vaati
C tier
Dixie Kong, Isaac
D tier
Bandanna Dee, Roy
LOL tier
Lana, Krystal
Yeah, I agree. It really isn't the game's fault for me. It should have been a Wii U release...I don't like spending hours on a cramped handheld screen.I honestly expect it to be a flop, and I don't care about the look of it all that much. It doesn't interest me, though it is hilarious seeing Abraham Lincoln, the Cowardly Lion and Tom Sawyer.
I'd switch Roy and Krystal on that list, honestly.Fix'd![]()
I'm still very confused as to why characters like Krystal and Lana are ranked so high, and why characters like Dixie Kong and Bandana Dee are ranked lower.So following the direct, I edited my list a bit
S tier
Mewtwo
A tier
Wolf, Krystal
B tier
King K Rool, Lana
C tier
Dixie Kong, Lucas
D tier
Isaac, Micaiah
LOL tier
Mask Link, Bandana Dee
@Jason the Yoshi , I still maintain that tiers are pretty pointless.
I honestly have to ask why Lana is that high. Granted, she's not impossible, but she's not to the point where I think she's above Lucas, Dixie Kong, Isaac and Bandana Dee. Same with Krystal to a greater extent.So following the direct, I edited my list a bit
S tier
Mewtwo
A tier
Wolf, Krystal
B tier
King K Rool, Lana
C tier
Dixie Kong, Lucas
D tier
Isaac, Micaiah
LOL tier
Mask Link, Bandana Dee
Even if we assume it'll flop on the 3DS (which it very well could, but that's getting into hypotheticals), I don't think it being on the Wii U would change that. Even with Smash, I don't think it'd get the install base to help its sales, and there's not a lot of strategy games on that system already to really attract that crowd. At least with the 3DS they have a larger group to appeal to, along with Fire Emblem fans that may give it a shot due to being from the same developer.Yeah, I agree. It really isn't the game's fault for me. It should have been a Wii U release...I don't like spending hours on a cramped handheld screen.
Water under the bridge, though.
That's the guy who thought Shadow was likely.I'm still very confused as to why characters like Krystal and Lana are ranked so high, and why characters like Dixie Kong and Bandana Dee are ranked lower.
This, admittedly, I do agree with. However, the fact is, I'm a massively HUGE fan of strategy RPG's, and this game doesn't appeal to me in the slightest. I love Tactical RPG's like Fire Emblem, and I might try Advance Wars. Codename: STEAM... it just doesn't interest me all that much.Even if we assume it'll flop on the 3DS (which it very well could, but that's getting into hypotheticals), I don't think it being on the Wii U would change that. Even with Smash, I don't think it'd get the installbase to help its sales, and there's not a lot of strategy games on that system already to really attract that crowd. At least with the 3DS they have a larger group to appeal to, along with Fire Emblem fans that may give it a shot due to being from the same developer.
Seriously? Lol. I'd absolutely love Shadow in Smash Bros., but I've known right from the start than not only was Shadow basically impossible to ever happen, but he legitimately should not be playable in Smash Bros. either.That's the guy who thought Shadow was likely.
I think K Rool is more likely than Dixie Kong, and in all honesty, even if Lana was third party, she would represent KT just fine, a historical success between them and Nintendo.I'm still very confused as to why characters like Krystal and Lana are ranked so high, and why characters like Dixie Kong and Bandana Dee are ranked lower.
Sad but true.Seriously? Lol. I'd absolutely love Shadow in Smash Bros., but I've known right from the start than not only was Shadow basically impossible to ever happen, but he legitimately should not be playable in Smash Bros. either.
That's a low blowThat's the guy who thought Shadow was likely.
Represent KT? Is that even necessary? I mean, why a one-shot character like Lana from a spin-off Zelda game when you could add a recurring character like Impa who also had a prominent role in said spin-off game? What does Lana have that Impa doesn't?I think K Rool is more likely than Dixie Kong, and in all honesty, even if Lana was third party, she would represent KT just fine, a historical success between them and Nintendo.
I didn't catch much out of Bandana Dees by watching the trailer of Kirby's Rainbow Curse, and I still honestly see him as Assist Trophy material.
And I suppose going into the Krystal thread and looking at all the perfect ideology they've conjured in the past weeks is too much effort. (Facepalm)
A bit earlier than that is when people were talking about it right in the Krystal threadRepresent KT? Is that even necessary? I mean, why a one-shot character like Lana from a spin-off Zelda game when you could add a recurring character like Impa who also had a prominent role in said spin-off game? What does Lana have that Impa doesn't?
And why is Dixie, a very popular Smash request, one of the most important Donkey Kong characters, and one of the stars of the latest hit installment of her series, ranked lower?
And for the record, I have checked out the Krystal thread recently, as I do with most characters I debate about. What I saw was mostly theories about codec conversations and talk about Bayonetta.
I think the point is that Dixie and K. Rool are about on the same level. Even though I personally think K. Rool is more likely than Dixie at this point, they are neck-and-neck. Both are very iconic DK characters and popular. K. Rool is FAR more popular, and is more important to the franchise, but Dixie's also the third most recurring main character and one of the very few female main heroes in gaming period, let alone Nintendo (she stared in DKC3, obviously). K. Rool beats Dixie Kong in my eyes, but only slightly.A bit earlier than that is when people were talking about it right in the Krystal thread
We have the Kremlings in Smash Run, and a great hero of a franchise can't exist without first a great sidekick and second a great villain, and Dixie Kong has been around less than K Rool
You must be referring to the talk about 2015 being the "Year of Star Fox" (according to Miyamoto), and how players at the special Smash Wii U event (like GameXplain) were restricted on unlocking content because Nintendo kept resetting the data every hour. The latter could have been because of Duck Hunt though.A bit earlier than that is when people were talking about it right in the Krystal thread.
I'm honestly starting to believe we might have additional characters in Smash Wii U that will be patched into Smash 3DS. I didn't think so at first, but I find several things very odd about how this was handled, and especially Andre's comment in GameExplain. He saw a character with great expressions, which I presumed was Duck Hunt, and he said he couldn't say who it was. Then later he mentioned Duck Hunt anyway.You must be referring to the talk about 2015 being the "Year of Star Fox" (according to Miyamoto), and how players at the special Smash Wii U event (like GameXplain) were restricted on unlocking content because Nintendo kept resetting the data every hour. The latter could have been because of Duck Hunt though.
However...
I found something interesting today that I'm gonna hold onto myself for now. It's not the time to present it yet. I'm waiting for a certain response...
Fixed that for ya.So following the direct, I edited my list a bit
S tier
Mewtwo
A tier
Wolf, Isaac
B tier
King K Rool, Bandana Waddle Dee
C tier
Dixie Kong, Lucas
D tier
Krystal, Micaiah
LOL tier
Mask Link, Lana
Mmm, noFixed that for ya.
B tier
King K Rool, Lana
B tier
King K Rool, Lana
Lana
B tier
Lana