Samtaro
Smash Rookie
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2014
- Messages
- 17
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
So then the question becomes... why is Super Smash Flash 2 there? It is a stand alone that doesn't require anyone buy the game... and it infringes on a lot more than PM. I mean I understand why they don't want PM there, but why not get rid of both?Whenever Nintendo sponsors a tournament, I almost guarantee you PM will be banned. Nintendo is real anal about stuff like that.
Super Smash Flash 2 doesn't require modding a Wii or hacking one of Nintendo's games.So then the question becomes... why is Super Smash Flash 2 there? It is a stand alone that doesn't require anyone buy the game... and it infringes on a lot more than PM. I mean I understand why they don't want PM there, but why not get rid of both?
Considering Project M's most accessible boot-up doesn't fiscally hurt continuing sales of Brawl, it seems even less harmful as SSF2 legally. Both SSF2 and P:M are non-profit, which is probably why Nintendo hasn't issued either McLeodGaming or the PMDT a cease-and-desist. Although, one concerns Nintendo endorsing a homebrew, hacking, and modding scene. So you be the judge on that.So then the question becomes... why is Super Smash Flash 2 there? It is a stand alone that doesn't require anyone buy the game... and it infringes on a lot more than PM. I mean I understand why they don't want PM there, but why not get rid of both?
SSF2 isn't hacking into a game and modding it. SSF2 isn't making itself superior to Brawl. SSF2 is not form outside perspective, a spite mod, made because you didn't like stuff in the game (it kinda is, but kinda isn't). SSF2 has been running a booth with no plans to change. SSF2 has less Nintendo characters, and most newcomers are 3rd party. SSF2 Isn't using a Nintendo game as a base. The first thing you see before playing SSF2, before you can even play, for 3 seconds before you can skip, is a notice that all IPs belong to respective owners, and can be taken away, AKA SSF2 knows and acknowledges first thing : none of it's content is truly theirs. SSF2 doesn't really compare to mainstream games, there is no big threat of SSF2 seeming better. And lastly, SSF2 is a fan game. If all the flash clones of SMB on the web are legal, then this game is even more legal.So then the question becomes... why is Super Smash Flash 2 there? It is a stand alone that doesn't require anyone buy the game... and it infringes on a lot more than PM. I mean I understand why they don't want PM there, but why not get rid of both?
Project M doesn't require a modded Wii at all. That is just a flat inaccurate statement. I've had my Wii since day 1 of the console's launch and have never modded it, and I've played Project M on it since 2011 or 2012.Super Smash Flash 2 doesn't require modding a Wii
Project M is basically aimed to be Melee 2.0 with Brawl's roster + Mewtwo and Roy. I don't know where you got a "superior to Brawl "aspect from, because Melee is nothing like Brawl (although competitively Melee [and Project M] is deeper in every regard just by design).SSF2 isn't hacking into a game and modding it. SSF2 isn't making itself superior to Brawl.
Am I missing something, or didn't Nintendo just recently say it was okay for fan projects to be made as long as they were non profit? Wouldn't this give the okay for projects like PM to be "acknowledged" by Nintendo without any need for legal action?
What nintendo said was that they will allow fans to use their intellectual property in derivative works.I have never heard of Nintendo saying that non-profit fan projects were ok. When did they say that? In my knowledge Nintendo has been very much against projects in which their games have been altered or modded in any way...even if those projects were non-profit.
And no even if Nintendo said that they were ok with non-profit projects like PM, it would not be ok for them to acknowledge PM. In short it would create a multitude of licensing issues. Im not too sure on the specifics but there are definite loopholes that could be exploited.
Dude, smash4 diddy is off topic. 's got nuthin' to do with PM at Apex. And you know Diddy's good in PM too, right?I hope Nintendo and sm4sh just leave Apex alone from now on. All the who-huh-hee-ha is getting out of hand, for Baphomet's sake. Stop forcing this non-fighter down everyone's throat. It's beyond the point of plausible denial now and Apex proves that.
What do you mean "good in PM"? Because I know you didn't mean Diddy's superior to everyone else like in 4. And there's nothing off-topic about Nintendo shoving their Diddy meme-generator smash where it doesn't belong, which IS the thread topic, btwDude, smash4 diddy is off topic. 's got nuthin' to do with PM at Apex. And you know Diddy's good in PM too, right?
Thread topic is about PM and Nintendo, not the current best character in the early stages of a new game's meta. Diddy is not superior to every other character. It only seems like it right now because M2K and ZeRo play him, and everyone assumes that means that Diddy is S4 God.What do you mean "good in PM"? Because I know you didn't mean Diddy's superior to everyone else like in 4. And there's nothing off-topic about Nintendo shoving their Diddy meme-generator smash where it doesn't belong, which IS the thread topic, btw
It's essentially code for "You can make a game in our name, but not from our game". Which is why SSF2 is still at Apex, yet PM couldn't even get a booth. Maybe they're fine with PM, but then they'd have to get Sega and Konami on board too.What nintendo said was that they will allow fans to use their intellectual property in derivative works.
We don't really know What that statement means in regards to PM.
Personally, I think it was Nintendo agreeing to not deliver a Cease and Desist, but nothing more. They're gonna let the game be okay, but that doesn't mean they have to like it or support it.It's essentially code for "You can make a game in our name, but not from our game". Which is why SSF2 is still at Apex, yet PM couldn't even get a booth. Maybe they're fine with PM, but then they'd have to get Sega and Konami on board too.
AKA they may be fine with PM. But the way it could be interpreted(The way I did) may have been a reason for them to not allow PM in.Personally, I think it was Nintendo agreeing to not deliver a Cease and Desist, but nothing more. They're gonna let the game be okay, but that doesn't mean they have to like it or support it.
Super smash flash doesn't use any copy-written material, so there's a huge important difference right there. It's legal to make your own sprites and use them like that. PM is using the copywritten material of brawl.So then the question becomes... why is Super Smash Flash 2 there? It is a stand alone that doesn't require anyone buy the game... and it infringes on a lot more than PM. I mean I understand why they don't want PM there, but why not get rid of both?
Based on what the Treehouse as said, I doubt they would aim for grassroots tournaments,I wouldn't rule out Nintendo banning Project M from the few if any supposed "grassroots" tournaments they sponsor (which so far means nothing for the pot, which is insanely stupid; Nintendo has put zero dollars and zero cents into Smash tournament pots, whereas Capcom, a company with at best 1/4th the earnings has put in 6 digits worth), as well as I wouldn't rule out Melee being bumped out of the main event spot for Smash Wi U despite being the bigger draw (and it isn't even close).
Depending on the aspects and if people like that.Project M is basically aimed to be Melee 2.0 with Brawl's roster + Mewtwo and Roy. I don't know where you got a "superior to Brawl "aspect from, because Melee is nothing like Brawl (although competitively Melee [and Project M] is deeper in every regard just by design).
That is a very extreme representation of the current state of the game. I don't see how Smash 4 has no more to offer, especially considering how new tricks are appearing on the subreddit every day. And the Teams in Smash 4 are really deep, man.PM is the only future I want or can even see for smash. I'm done with melee, brawl and already sm4sh, which is the worst one of all. If anyone thinks Diddy will be countered in an advanced meta, I've got some news for you: There's nothing there in any character that could ever potentially cause problems for Diddy. The meta that evolved for melee also contains abstract knowledge that is applied to sm4sh, bringing its meta up to speed with whatever is applicable, meaning it is almost as if years of meta was already developed for it. There is no meta evolving for sm4sh because it has even less to offer than melee had. This is endgame.
Or, we could allow customs, and Diddy/Shiek/Sonic crash down to unviable tier, and we get like 20-30 top tiers.PM is the only future I want or can even see for smash. I'm done with melee, brawl and already sm4sh, which is the worst one of all. If anyone thinks Diddy will be countered in an advanced meta, I've got some news for you: There's nothing there in any character that could ever potentially cause problems for Diddy. The meta that evolved for melee also contains abstract knowledge that is applied to sm4sh, bringing its meta up to speed with whatever is applicable, meaning it is almost as if years of meta was already developed for it. There is no meta evolving for sm4sh because it has even less to offer than melee had. This is endgame.
Book, get back to me when sm4sh tourney's aren't won by hoohah. I'm in plausible deniability mode as of now. And to be on topic, Nintendo has legal requirements to follow so they can't just allow any derivative games to be in their presence. I have no idea why they allowed SSF. It must have slipped through the cracks or something. It's not even up to them; if they allow it, they lose their IP rights.
That's fair enough. I think, though, personally, that the main reasons that there isn't a C&D are that A) the mod really only appeals to Competitive fans, who make up a relatively small portion of sales, and B) you gotta own the game to use it anywayI'm not gonna pretend I understand Nintendo's thinking. Right now, I'm wondering if they aren't truly insulted by the notion that a mod could be more impressive than their own work so they don't want anyone to know about PM and try to ban it anywhere they can. That C&D doesn't come only because they don't want to anger a bunch of computer-savvy nerds that might bring the hacker thunder down on their servers. Only someone from the inside could ever explain their stance on it.
Actually you do not need the game to run PMThat's fair enough. I think, though, personally, that the main reasons that there isn't a C&D are that A) the mod really only appeals to Competitive fans, who make up a relatively small portion of sales, and B) you gotta own the game to use it anyway
now you're just talking about piracy though, which isn't what tournaments would do.Actually you do not need the game to run PM
unfortunately they havenow you're just talking about piracy though, which isn't what tournaments would do.
if they were sponsored by Nintendo they sure wouldntunfortunately they have
Some do when they run PM.now you're just talking about piracy though, which isn't what tournaments would do.
Oh is that panel thing up on the Screw Attack yet=???Based on what the Treehouse as said, I doubt they would aim for grassroots tournaments,
Hmm interesting for about PM when they talked to Prog they were more or less saying they liked the mod but Nintendo could not support it officially.Oh is that panel thing up on the Screw Attack yet=???
I'm curious about what it will say, since Nintendo has not been nice to the competitive scene until about a year ago in the slightest.
Heck, their Treehouse members generally speaking refuse to even say the words "Melee" or "Brawl" when talking about Melee and Brawl in tournaments, which I find puzzling.
I know some Treehouse members said that a while ago. I don't see why anyone is opposed to this, especially since details emerged that the APEX thing was likely Alex Strife's fault.Hmm interesting for about PM when they talked to Prog they were more or less saying they liked the mod but Nintendo could not support it officially.