• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

A case of smash the oddity of Disney

The_Naraotor

Smash Ace
Joined
Apr 26, 2014
Messages
538
Location
Smash on To Yer Helmet
Switch FC
SW-1669-2956-1774
Being not worthy to be a thread on the Ultimate General Discussion because what I am going to talk here is more speculative than anything and I don't believe that any of my speculation will make it in the game for the simple rules of only "video games character".

So let's begin why Disney is Odd with a capital O it's because despite having Sora for Smash this one is a shared character with Square Enix making him not 100% owned by either compagny. So who choose to represent Disney ?

The only answer is Mickey let's face facts Mickey is the only valuable character that represent Disney as a whole, Mickey is also the mascot of the compagny and the first mascot ever created (I believe I think).

And with this facts in mind if either Sakurai add a character from Disney that is not from Kingdom Hearts that character will be de facto IMO Mickey thus breaking the rules of only for "video game characters"

That's why I believe that if the rule is to be broken that will happen with Disney and Mickey first. Because Mickey is too iconic too massive in regard to the History of mascot to let the mouse left behind. Disney = Mickey and Mickey = Disney.

So have you the same belief that if the rule is to be broken that will happen because of Disney ? Or do you have another compagny in mind that can break this rule ? If ever.
 
Top Bottom