Strong Bad

Guest Writer - Smashboards Administrator
Strong Bad
PMRank 2016 Recap
  • 9,732
  • 6
Equipped with handy infographics, Sabre and Strong Bad take a deeper look at PMRank to analyze things such as character and regional representation among the top 50, as well as some predictions as to how they may change in 2017.
PMRank 2016: Top 3
  • 19,775
  • 9
Today marks the conclusion of PMRank as we present the Top 3 Project M players of 2016. None of these players were part of the conversation for best player in 2015, but each exhibited meteoric rises to top player status last year. .
PMRank 2016: 6-4
  • 15,943
  • 5
PMRank continues today with ranks 6-4! Within the top 6, we have reached the portion of the list filled exclusively with Project M Titans.
6-4 pmrank draft
  • 10
  • 0
PMRank continues today with ranks 6-4! Within the top 6, we have reached the portion of the list filled exclusively with Project M Titans. Each has demonstrated a significant level of dominance within their own region and put their skills to the test at nationals throughout 2016. While these players didn't make top 3 on the list this year, make no mistake: any of these players are fully capable of becoming the best in 2017.

PMRank is a panel-based Power Ranking of the top 50 Project M players worldwide. Players, commentators, and tournament organizers within the community had the opportunity to apply to be panelists, and we ended up with about 20 panelists by the time of the project's conclusion. Initially, 85 players were qualified to be ranked based on their placings and attendance at major Project M events throughout 2016. Only 50 highly skilled players made the final list.
PMRank 2016: 10-7
  • 14,135
  • 2
Hello and welcome to Day 5 of PMRank! Today we start with the top 10 of PMRank2016. All of these players have proven time and time again with their placings that they belong here. .
PMRank 2016: 20-11
  • 14,847
  • 12
Welcome to day 4 of PMRank! As each article goes on, the competition gets more fierce. Today's ranking primarily features a myriad of East Coast gatekeepers and few players you may know from their Melee exploits.
PMRank 2016: 30-21
  • 12,709
  • 2
PMRank continues after a short hiatus with ranks 30-21! Today’s section of the ranking is filled with coastal rivalry, with a few entries from the often underrated Midwest. Catch ranks 20-11 tomorrow here on SmashBoards!
PMRank 2016: 30-21
  • 21
  • 0
PMRank continues after a short hiatus with ranks 30-21! Today’s section of the ranking is filled with coastal rivalry with a few entries from the often underrated Midwest. Catch ranks 20-11 tomorrow here on SmashBoards!

PMRank is a panel-based Power Ranking of the top 50 Project M players worldwide. Players, commentators, and tournament organizers within the community had the opportunity to apply to be panelists, and we ended up with about 20 panelists by the time of the project's conclusion. Initially, 85 players were qualified to be ranked based on their placings and attendance at major Project M events throughout 2016. Only 50 highly skilled players made the final list.
PMRank 2016: 40-31
  • 14,595
  • 7
Welcome to the second day of the very first PMRank! This week features long-standing veterans of the game as well as some faces more commonly associated with other Smash titles. We are taking a short break tomorrow and will be back Thursday with ranks 30-21.

PMRank is a panel-based Power Ranking of the top 50 Project M players worldwide. Players, commentators, and tournament organizers within the community had the opportunity to apply to be panelists, and we ended up with about 20 panelists by the time of the project's conclusion. Initially, 85 players were qualified to be ranked based on their placings and attendance at major Project M events throughout 2016. Only 50 highly skilled players made the final list.
PMRank 2016: 50-41
  • 21,686
  • 13
Welcome to the very first PMRank! We are pleased that SmashBoards is hosting our articles for the inaugural list.

PMRank is a panel-based Power Ranking of the top 50 Project M players worldwide. Players, commentators, and tournament organizers within the community had the opportunity to apply to be panelists, and we ended up with about 20 panelists by the time of the project's conclusion. Initially, 85 players were qualified to be ranked based on their placings and attendance at major Project M events throughout 2016. Only 50 highly skilled players made the final list.
Top